First off, this article assumes familiarity with Maker CDP's. (If not, I highly suggest reading up on it!)
Recall that the liquidation ratio of a CDP is the collateral-to-debt ratio of the CDP. For example, if the liquidation ratio is 150% on ETH/USD, if ETH is 66 of debt (that is, generate up to $66 Dai) as your collateral is worth 150% of your debt. This gives us a leverage ratio of 1.6x. But can we go higher?
Assuming enough liquidity exists, we can then buy 0.66 ETH with this Dai.
We can then put this ETH back into our CDP to draw more Dai. We can draw \66.66 * 1/1.5 = $44.44$ more Dai from our CDP. We can keep doing this forever to generate more Dai and thus more leverage; however, we get less Dai each time. But how much?
Let represent the liquidation ratio and represent our maximum leverage ratio. We compute to be the following
But this is just a geometric series with and . Using the infinite sum of geometric series formula, we get:
which in the case of , 3x leverage.
The above calculation accounts for the maximum leverage in an infinitely liquid ETH/DAI market with an instant ability to fund a CDP. However, there are several factors that come into play:
The amount of ETH one can buy with Dai is currently very limited, and the spread is significantly wide. The above calculations make the assumption that one can continue to buy more ETH at the market price, which is very far from the truth.
However, this liquidity will improve over time, as the future of the Maker system requires this liquidity to exist for its auto-liquidation system to work.
There are several actions one must perform to increase the collateral locked in the CDP contract, all taking one block each:
One should note that step 3 will not exist in the final version of Maker -- pooled Ether is a workaround to the MKR token generation system not being in place. However, this means that at a minimum, three blocks will pass before the CDP can be refunded.
If one generates the maximum amount of Dai from the CDP, they are at immediate risk of liquidation if the price of Ether drops even one cent. Since the process of refunding the CDP is not atomic, there is a very real risk of this liquidation taking place.
In theory, one could write a smart contract that performs this entire 4-step process in one transaction with a specified minimum accepted price. Before this exists, however, one is subject to the aformentioned risks.
(If you liked this post, join our crypto Discord!)